There is a world of difference between disruption and destruction. Disruption can be good in that it productively and convincingly intervenes into practices that have become accepted over time. Quite often these practices are outdated and need their inadequacies to be brought up for discussion and change. Destruction, on the other hand, causes right the opposite. It causes regression and the erection of more barriers. It brings a group's intentions into question as the physical actions do not represent what is being professed. It can repulse potentially influential supporters, against a cause. As obvious as the difference appears to be, there is confusion between needed disruption and un-needed destruction. Perhaps it is the individuals in a group who are attempting to be leaders and do not yet understand what a leader really is.
It is important to do research on the groups that you think you might relate to. Groups gear their propaganda exactly in a manner that coaxes people into thinking that they have something in common with the group. It is important to be able to look past the propaganda and find out who the stakeholders in the group are. Understand the life-long consequences that will accompany the decision to join a group and do not make the decision based solely on how much "noise" a group or a person is making. It's easy to allow yourself to be worked up into a "feeding frenzy" from the environment that is created by "the noise". You could be joining a group for the right reasons and end up being the only one in the group that is wanting to do the right thing. Do not make any decisions without researching an issue from unbiased sources.
Regardless of your position on various issues, political associations, or religious convictions, protect yourself from being a victim of "emotional decision-making". Don't become involved with just another "emotional big-mouth" that has lost control of their reasoning capabilities. Evaluate the person or persons to see if they are a true leader. Is the, so-called leader, in it only for themselves? Are they a responsible leader that will not lead their followers down a one-way path of no return, nor a path of destruction that can negatively alter a follower's existence for the rest of their lives. Once the goals of the group are achieved or the group evaporates over time, a follower needs to be able to keep living their life. They do not need to be forever entangled and affected by the bad decisions of an "emotional big-mouth".
Is the person or people in charge of your group of interest, leaders that are going to take care of you while in the group's quests, or are they just another "emotional big-mouth"? We really do need to know before promoting their cause or putting our lives and livelihoods in their hands.
Joe McLaughlin
09/17/20